Whenever a child dials 999, the operator comes on line as the call is connected, telling us that they’re connecting a call from a child. This is because about 90% of calls from children are the little devils playing with mobile phones. Mums and dads — please keep mobiles out of reach of little hands! On Christmas Day it seemed we spent half the day ringing back mobiles and trying to trace their owners, only to find some small person had got carried away with their new “toy”.
Anyway, yesterday the operator came on line telling me there was a child on line, and then there was silence. I was fully expecting this to be the usual child playing scenario, since when children do make genuine calls, they are actually a lot better at it and calmer than adult callers.
“What’s the problem? What’s happened?” I said, for the third time, and finally a little voice started to speak.
“Can you come? Mummy’s cut her wrists and there is blood everywhere!”
Oh hell, I thought, not a child playing after all. Unless it’s one with a really sick sense of humour.
“Yes, we can come,” I said “what’s your address?”
“Don’t know!” said the child. “I rang my uncle and he told me not to call you and that if I did I would get in trouble!”
This was just getting better and better. I sensed the child was scared to give me her address because of what her uncle had said, but after a bit of coaxing, she provided the name of a hotel, the fact that it was in London and a room number. Unfortunately, she had a bit of a lisp, so when she said “four thirteen” I thought she said “floor thirteen” and asked her for the room number again.
“I already told you, four thirteen! Aren’t you listening?” she said indignantly, which would have made me laugh if it hadn’t been such a dire situation. Children sound really amusing when they are trying to be authoritive.
“Okay, you’re doing really well,” I said, “now I just need to know the street name and which part of London it’s in — do you know that?”
(Damn our stupid mapping system that doesn’t have things like hotels on it…)
“No!” wailed the child breaking into noisy sobs “my uncle said you wouldn’t come! You’re not coming, are you?”
“Yes!” I said, trying not to panic — the sound of a small child in such obvious distress not helping much — “of course we’ll find you, we’ll look everywhere until we do, but if we knew a bit more of the address we’d find you faster.”
“Mu-MMMMEEEEE!” screeched the child. “MUUUUUMMEEEEEEEEEEE!!! Come here Mummy! Come here Mummy!”
Eventually a woman came to the phone and I asked her for the address.
“Salright,” she said in a slurred voice “m’okay, jussssht fine. Don’ send the umblunce, mmfine.”
“Just let us send someone round to see if you’re okay?” I asked, but the phone went down.
Now, according to Nee Naw Service policy, if the patient refuses an ambulance we are not supposed to send one, even if they are dying in a horrible way. This is because everyone has the right to refuse medical treatment, unless they are sectioned under the mental health act, which is not something that can be done on the spot. I decided that I was going to conveniently forget about this rule, and with the help of the operator, who found the phone’s approximate location, and Directory Enquiries, I found the address of the hotel and off went the nee naw and the police.
The ambulance crew got there first and someone, probably the child, let them in. They reported back to us that the patient had been self harming and was very drunk, and the child was only five years old. This shocked me; I had assumed she was older. I’m useless at telling kids’ ages from their voices, and even if they are stood in front of me I am not much better, but from the maturity displayed in her language and the way she took charge of the situation I would have put her at about ten. The patient was refusing hospital, but after the police arrived everything went quiet for a while and then the ambulance set off for the hospital, so she must have changed her mind.
I hope they both got the help that they needed.
I’m not particularly fond of children and the plight of a child in need doesn’t usually tug my heartstrings in the same way as a frail elderly person or a puppy with an injured paw, but I’ve been thinking about this poor little girl a lot. When I was five life was all Transformers, Scalectrix and pretending to be a superhero and I don’t think I knew that self harming even existed.
January 18th, 2006 at 8:08 pm
Well done for forgetting the rule.
What a sad life that little girl must be leading right now. She shouldn’t have to deal with things like that.
January 18th, 2006 at 8:11 pm
google has the addresses of all the hotels on it - surely you could get a web browser until your computer systems were brought into the 21st century?
January 18th, 2006 at 8:23 pm
We used to have web browsers, but they proved a bit of a distraction, and the computers were locked so the only thing we can use on them is the ambulance related stuff. There is a computer in the dispatch room with a web browser that we can use for those things, but I was too lazy to get out of my seat, so I rang directory enquiries instead.
January 18th, 2006 at 8:58 pm
“Don’t know!” said the child. “I rang my uncle and he told me not to call you and that if I did I would get in trouble!”
This bit seems like just about the saddest part of this whole scenario. What a horrible situation for a small child.
January 19th, 2006 at 12:26 am
I dread to think the situation both the chld and the mother must have been in. As an ex-self harmer I cant think of a situation I could get myself in that would be bad enough for me to self harm in front of a child, let alone my own child!
January 19th, 2006 at 12:36 am
I can just imagine what the child’s “uncle” is like, giving advice like that. I really hope life gets better for the wee one and her Mummy.
January 19th, 2006 at 12:49 am
I bet he wasn’t her real uncle either. In magazines, whenever a child has to call his/her mother’s new boyfriend “uncle” something, it’s a dead giveaway that the man is going to end up abusing the child in a really horrible way.
Let’s hope he doesn’t give the child any more advice like that — and be glad that even at five years old, she had the sense not to listen to him. Most children just do what adults tell them, however wrong it seems.
January 19th, 2006 at 4:08 am
I’m glad I lived in my sheltered world when I was 5 and the only thing I really cared about was what colour dress I might put on Barbie today and whether she’d wear shoes or not.
*sigh*
January 19th, 2006 at 5:45 am
Wonderful writing. I’ve been there a few times myself. Even no one may tell you but me, you’re a hero. You went that extra step and saved a life. Bless you. I wish you were working for me.
January 19th, 2006 at 6:07 am
I’ve been thinking about this poor little girl a lot. When I was five life was all Transformers, Scalectrix and pretending to be a superhero and I don’t think I knew that self harming even existed.
Took the words right out of my mouth.
Also, what Kayjay and Liz said.
If the mother died or was permanently injured in those circumstances, could the “uncle” be charged?
January 19th, 2006 at 6:09 am
Must learn to type name first.
January 19th, 2006 at 9:11 am
OMG that is soo sad .. Iv been in the oposite situation to that where iv been the selfharmer child and its not nice to be in either situation . I feel so sorry for that little girl hope she does get suitiable support and her mom there must be lots behind it.
January 19th, 2006 at 9:48 am
Well done on following your commom sense and ignoring that rule.
It makes me very sad to think of children in situations like that, who are robbed of their innocent child years and forced to grow up quicker because of a lifestyle they have imposed on them.
I was lucky as you were, and just had to think of what adventures my action man was going to be involved in that day.
January 19th, 2006 at 11:05 am
What a terrible situation. I definately think you made the right decision to send an ambulance despite the rule.
Also, considering what the ‘uncle’ said, it might have stemed from fear the child would be taken off the mother if she’s in crisis. I’m not sure how social services work. Having said that, it’s better for her to get the help she needs.
January 19th, 2006 at 11:54 am
Good to see you used your discretion on this call, I wonder what management would have said?
It is a sad world we live in when a 5 year old has to take responsibilty for her Mum and be dealing with conflict between 2 adults.
I’m glad she was intelligent enough to do the right thing.
The Driving Instructor
January 19th, 2006 at 3:44 pm
I hope that even if I had followed the rule and marked the call as “cancelled”, someone upstairs would have seen it and overriden my decision. It’s also worth noting that I noted on the ticket that the patient was refusing help, which would have been seen by the dispatch desk and crew, both of whom also ignored the “don’t send if patient refuses” rule. So the “heroic rule ignoring” was not just down to me!
As regards the uncle, I think TP is right in saying that the uncle was probably worried that the child would be taken into care, although that doesn’t excuse what he said… what if the mother died or ended up harming the child? I doubt he could be charged, though… it’s not like he caused her injuries or physically prevented the child from getting help. No law against telling people not to call an ambulance!
January 19th, 2006 at 4:29 pm
The longterm psychological ramifications for a child at that age are a concern indeed. Obviously the mother is very unwell.
Good on you for braking the rules, when they needed to be broken.
January 19th, 2006 at 8:32 pm
A child protection referral is indicated here, I think. This girl is almost certainly a child in need within the meaning of the Children Act
January 19th, 2006 at 9:28 pm
Let’s hope that’s what happened. It’d be nice if the crew that picked them up or someone from the hospital was reading this and could let us know. The worst thing about this job is that you rarely get to find out what happens once the patient is through the doors of A+E…
January 20th, 2006 at 3:58 am
Yes, Mark. That may be the most maddening part of this job. With the new patient privacy acts over here in the US, we can’t even ask the EMT’s what happened when they call in for their times and case numbers. As a consequence, we only never find out “what happened” but those of the public who may want to thank us personally cannot. It all combines to make you feel that this is just another job and you should never get interested in what you do. If you do get emotionally wrapped up in it you’ll have a big fall coming. It’s an absolute shame.
January 20th, 2006 at 4:11 am
Oh crikey, JP, that’s awful. I understand the need for privacy laws but I think that’s a step too far. We’ve all signed a patient confidentiality thing and we know what’s acceptable and what’s not. At least here the only thing preventing us finding out what happens next is poor communication — at the moment, anyway.
I know getting emotionally wrapped up is a bad idea but in a way knowing the outcome helps — stops you wondering.
Maybe in a few months the mother will read this and recognise herself and let us all know the (hopefully happy) ending.
January 20th, 2006 at 3:13 pm
Sadly the above story is probably repeated through the land on a daily basis - it’s just that we don’t hear about it. And it is only when it is brought to our attention that we stop and say ‘isn’t that terrible’.
Five year old children should be that - just five year old children. The only problem of their day should be deciding which toys to play with and who they are going to play with at school. Sadly real life is no longer like that for an awful lot of children. And sadder still, a lot of today’s social workers have similar backgrounds to that poor childs, and so have empathy with it rather than seeing an immediate need of how wrong it really is to the eyes of the rest of the world.
And changing the subject slightly - as for follow-up, can it not be arranged that Mr. Reynolds reality ambulance is always the one despatched to your calls so at least we get some follow up from him - we then need a blog by the staff at A and E where he takes them off to . . .
January 21st, 2006 at 9:33 am
good fucking job. done that the odd time myself with the help of a duty officer. good man. kids should never have to see stuff like that, but if we can help them. the cost is always worth it.
January 22nd, 2006 at 3:46 pm
Britblog Roundup # 49
Only three weeks away from our first anniversary edition! Get your nominations for next week’s Britblog Roundup in to britblog AT gmail DOT com. This week’s first entry simply has to be Mr Free Market and his astonishing discovery of
February 3rd, 2006 at 3:11 pm
Timothy Brown said,
Mark Myers said,
Umm, hope I’m not talking out of turn, but in our trust Control staff can make referrals themselves based on information received during a call. It’s perfectly possible that a form is filled in by Control staff, and then another one by the attending crew if they are also concerned. Don’t know whether your Trust has any similar reporting mechanism for Crews which could also be used by control?