These days, it is very rare that I get a call that I haven’t heard before. It seems that there are a finite number of ailments in the world and that the same ones come up again and again. There are some, like chest pains and old people fallen over in the street, that I will without fail take several times per shift. There are some, on the other hand, like the old woman stuck in a dustbin, the rape victim and the young man who dropped dead for no apparent reason during sex with his girlfriend, that I’ve only taken once. I have, so far, never taken a shooting or a complicated birth but I expect I shall at some point. Anyway, yesterday I heard something I’d never heard before. The caller was a young man from south of the river and he sounded panicked and out of breath.

“It’s my girlfriend’s baby, she’s one — I just went to check on her and she was caught up in some trousers — they were caught round her neck. She looked all blue and floppy!”

“Oh, sh*t!” I thought to myself. I didn’t say it out loud, obviously. I clicked the “strangulation” button, which instantly gives the call a Red-1 category, the highest you can get, and then ploughed on, thinking that this poor baby was a goner.

“Is she conscious?” I asked. “Is she breathing?”

“Yes! Yes!” said the man. “It didn’t look like she was at first, but I unwrapped her, and she started gasping, and she’s looking kind of normal now.”

Inwardly, I did a little dance and jumped up and down shouting “hooray”. Dead baby calls tend to spoil my day…

The rest of the triaging part of the call was fairly standard — the man answered all the questions properly and the call went down to a Red-3, which is still a category A, but a lesser kind of category A. Since the man and his girlfriend were in a big panic I offered to stay on line in case there were any changes. I could hear the baby crying in the background, and from their descriptions she was obviously fully alert and breathing normally, so I wasn’t unduly worried. As far as I could tell, the man had averted a tragedy by checking on the baby when he did — they were very lucky.

Glancing at the log to see how far away the ambulance was, I noticed that dispatch had called the police on the request of the ambulance crew. Now, I get a lot of calls where there has been some kind of foul play and usually, they stand out a mile. The general public made very bad liars. They usually try to cover up by going down one of two routes, which are polar opposites. Some turn defensive and give as little information as possible: “It’s a serious head wound! Why are you asking what happened? Just send the ambulance! You’re wasting time by asking for details! You don’t want to help! If she dies it will be your fault!” etc, whereas others will give an improbably detailed account containing details that are utterly irrelevant to an ambulance dispatcher, but make it clear that it wasn’t their fault: “So I was in the bedroom, which was upstairs, talking to my girlfriend on the phone - she can tell you that herself - and I heard a noise from downstairs. The child slipped on a green toy car and banged her head on our Toshiba washing machine, which came from Argos. We got it in 1992 and I don’t think it’s safe because it has very hard edges.” I was quite satisfied the man was telling the truth in this case, and I felt I ought to prepare him for the other kind of emergency service turning up.

Taking a deep breath, I announced “Don’t panic, but the ambulance crew have asked the police to come. It’s just routine — they haven’t heard this call, all they know is that they’re coming to a baby who has been accidentally strangled and they want to check it out.”

The man’s first reaction was to ask if we were still sending the ambulance, to which I replied yes, of course we were. I don’t think that would have been the reaction of an attempted child murderer either. After this he started to worry a bit (”how will they know that I didn’t hurt her?”) and I did my best to reassure him that there were plenty of ways they could find out. I felt dead sorry for him — as if he didn’t have enough to worry about with his stepdaughter having a narrow escape, he would also have to be questioned by the police too. Still, I suppose it is better that innocent people get questioned than guilty people get given the benefit of the doubt. I just hope there is evidence that he was innocent.

… of course, his face may be appearing in next week’s papers with the headline “South London Baby Murder Psychopath Confesses All” and then I may have to eat my words.

Published Mar 07, 2006 -

9 Comments on “A Strange Call”
  1. Chess Says:

    lol, aww..gotta feel sorry for the poor guy..Lets hope he’s not a Baby Murder Psychopath!

  2. Val Says:

    I hate to sound pervy but to whom did the trousers belong that the little one was caught up in….? If you see what I’m getting at…..I mean, where they ON ?

  3. Mark Myers Says:

    As far as I understood, the baby had been lying on a bed, and the trousers were also on the bed, not being worn by anyone.

    I hadn’t thought of it that way!

  4. PJ Says:

    I’ve had calls go both ways in these circumstances and I can tell you the police and EMT’s are very right in being suspicious. No one thought Jeffrey Dahmer looked dangerous and John Wayne Gacy was a clown for children’s parties. Believe me, you never know.

  5. Jay Says:

    Our then-18-month-old came into our bed one night having put two pairs of his own dungarees on over his pyjamas and a pair of tights (loosely) around his neck. Small children do some very odd things while sleeping/partially awake and trousers around neck doesn’t surprise me at all. It sounds like this chap was extremely lucky in his timing and I hope you’re entirely right about his sincerity.

  6. Souka Says:

    Nice post. I would like to see more !!!! But, I appreciate it isn’t an easy thing to blog about.

    As for the child and the call. I am in no position to say what is and what isn’t. I just hope, for the kids sake, it was just an accident and nothing more.

  7. Tom Reynolds Says:

    It’s one of those calls I’ll wander into without police attendance because I’ll be using common sense rather than LAS policy. And lets face it - a ’strangled’ child is worth the risk of me having to fight someone.

  8. The Driving Instructor Says:

    I’m glad the baby turned out to be okay, as a father of little children I can understand how the man felt. Children can do all sorts of things. My 2 month old daughter is already covering her face with her blanket it it is loose!

    Nice post Mark

    The Driving Instructor

  9. Adam Says:

    It is understandable that many people feel that the safest approach is to assume parents are child-molesters unless they can prove otherwise; after all, surely the parents’ feelings are much less important than preventing any risk to the child.

    However, it seems to me that we are rapidly getting to a situation where parents are becoming afraid to call an ambulance or take their child to A&E in case the child is taken away from them. This is hardly a safe situation for the child either.

Comment:

Back to Posts